tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2822678093661476153.post5140379359259617799..comments2023-10-21T03:53:43.281-04:00Comments on Where's Luke?: BlogiquetteOpen Barhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01296373954499786645noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2822678093661476153.post-72318004746563000212008-06-20T17:23:00.000-04:002008-06-20T17:23:00.000-04:00Incidentally, regarding Side Bar's thoughts on the...Incidentally, regarding Side Bar's thoughts on the term "cockblogging":<BR/><BR/>http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cockbloggingOpen Barhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01296373954499786645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2822678093661476153.post-21589915969289539382008-06-18T22:40:00.000-04:002008-06-18T22:40:00.000-04:00And another thing. How is it possible we've used ...And another thing. How is it possible we've used the "dogs raping children-funny" tag twice, while the "zeppelin" tag has been used only once?ChuckJerryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16596845287728762643noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2822678093661476153.post-54616072608823404972008-06-18T22:37:00.000-04:002008-06-18T22:37:00.000-04:00The only issue I have is the tags that are literal...The only issue I have is the tags that are literally a complete sentence. Why? Defeats the purpose of tags.<BR/><BR/>I'm not saying it should be outlawed, but it's counterproductive. Certainly not efficient.ChuckJerryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16596845287728762643noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2822678093661476153.post-27076926343216191042008-06-18T20:07:00.000-04:002008-06-18T20:07:00.000-04:00touche'i meant side bar.touche'<BR/><BR/>i meant side bar.The Notorious LJThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05924416653337149389noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2822678093661476153.post-57903912299954936992008-06-18T19:46:00.000-04:002008-06-18T19:46:00.000-04:00"good points open bar but, to paraphrase peter ven...<I>"good points open bar but, to paraphrase peter venkman, really more of a guideline than a rule."</I><BR/><BR/>I hadn't made any points. Did you just mean "side bar" instead?<BR/><BR/>"Yes it's true. This [LJT] has no dick."Open Barhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01296373954499786645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2822678093661476153.post-56119130470649620132008-06-18T19:42:00.000-04:002008-06-18T19:42:00.000-04:00i know you didn't write that post you son of a mot...i know you didn't write that post you son of a motherless goatThe Notorious LJThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05924416653337149389noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2822678093661476153.post-83977459822563378952008-06-18T19:17:00.000-04:002008-06-18T19:17:00.000-04:00First off, LJT, I didn't write that post.And to ad...First off, LJT, I didn't write that post.<BR/><BR/>And to address Side Bar's ideas:<BR/><BR/>1. I think cockblogging would be fine, but it would be courteous to at least mention the post you just "demoted" at the beginning, informing whoever's reading that immediately below is something worth reading. I certainly don't think there should be some mandatory waiting period. Sometimes a quick run of posts is necessary if we're all aching to let each other know our brilliant opinions on whatever the topic of the day is.<BR/><BR/>2. Again, I think it's just common courtesy to comment on each other's posts in the first place, but I'd say even moreso if you're about to post something immmediately after someone else just did. (And jeez, Side Bar, for someone who was clearly very offended by a prior act of cockblogging, you certainly don't seem interested in helping to resolve the issue through something as simple as saying "Nice post, jackass.")<BR/><BR/>3. As you can see, the tags are arranged by frequency of use, so it's pretty fucking easy to find a common tag. I think it can be pretty fucking funny to make the tag part of the joke. And ever so rarely, a tag like "Dogs Raping Kids -- Funny?" finds appropriate usage twice. That's funny, and should be encouraged. And a tag like "Joe Buck is a child predator" should be used more often, so it's good that we've archived it.<BR/><BR/>All in all, I agree with the "more of a guideline than a rule" thing, but mostly, as the post's title -- Blogiquette -- indicates, it's simply common courtesy. Which, of course, is the purpose of blogs.Open Barhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01296373954499786645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2822678093661476153.post-40176086808428001852008-06-18T18:58:00.000-04:002008-06-18T18:58:00.000-04:00no, no and no.waiting period - i don't think it m...no, no and no.<BR/><BR/>waiting period - i don't think it matters. people who read the blog read it relatively regularly and i don't think a new post really stops anyone from reading the second one unless it's ridiculously long, perhaps but that's really an exception.<BR/><BR/>commenting first - again, nice to do i guess but not mandatory. maybe polite, but not to be made into a 'rule', per se.<BR/><BR/>tags - it's dope to build up a category and maybe it's good to try to fit it into one but the real point of the tags if you want to go back later on and read all the posts about, say, ;open bar is a giant fuckhead' or something. it's not a problem at all to use like three or four tags. what if a post doesn't fit into one of the pre-existing tags. i just bought a wok, what if i want to post about that? where does that fit.<BR/><BR/>good points open bar but, to paraphrase peter venkman, really more of a guideline than a rule.The Notorious LJThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05924416653337149389noreply@blogger.com